Dating in Your 20sTake the quiz

Apps and texting

Why do I text more when they text less?

When a connection feels less certain, an anxious-leaning brain tries to close the gap by reaching: faster replies, extra texts, more plans. In your 20s, with app matches and unlabeled situationships, the thread often carries the whole relationship, so a quieter phone hits harder than it should.

Jump to a section
  1. Why does a slower reply make you want to send more?
  2. Is it really about how many texts you send?
  3. Why does it hit harder in a situationship?
  4. What might be going on for them?
  5. How does texting more backfire?
  6. What can you do tonight?

Because when a connection starts to feel less certain, a brain that leans anxious tries to close the gap by reaching: faster replies, an extra “haha anyway,” another plan floated. Each text is a small way of asking “are we still okay?” without asking it, and the catch is that the more you send, the less each reply tells you, and the more room the other person may feel they need.

Why does a slower reply make you want to send more?

Say you’re 24 and three weeks into something with a person you matched with on the apps. The first week was voice notes and memes at 1 a.m. This week it’s “lol” and “yeah for sure,” a few hours apart. You notice you’re replying within seconds, and you’ve sent two messages in a row twice today.

That reflex has a name in attachment research. Psychologists Phillip Shaver and Mario Mikulincer describe attachment anxiety as a tendency to turn the attachment system up when closeness feels shaky: more effort to get reassurance and contact, and more scanning for signs of rejection.1 Attachment anxiety is a sliding scale, not a label, and almost everyone moves along it depending on how uncertain a situation feels. A new, unlabeled thing with someone from the apps is about as uncertain as it gets.

The texting studies show the same pull. In a 2022 survey of 302 undergraduates in relationships, Prit Patel, Elizabeth Mahar and Gregory Webster found that more anxious people wanted more messages than they were getting, actually received fewer, and replied faster than their partners did.2 A small study of 31 college women by Robert Weisskirch found attachment anxiety went with more texts sent to and from a partner.3

Is it really about how many texts you send?

Maybe not. A 2025 study by Rachel Reymann Vanderbilt, Miriam Brinberg and Yifei Lu went past surveys and looked at the real message histories of 40 college students in early dating. Anxiety didn’t predict how often people texted. What it predicted was more future-focused language: “this weekend?”, “next time,” “we should.”4

So “I text more” might really be “I text with more riding on it.” Every message is carrying a second job, which is to get proof that there’s a next time. That’s why a one-word reply can feel like a door closing when it might just be a person on a bus.

Why does it hit harder in a situationship?

Because in your 20s, early dating often lives almost entirely in the thread. You might see each other once a week and text the other six days, so the thread becomes the relationship.

A 2024 study of women in developing relationships by Chelsea Guest and Pamara Chang found that people expected messaging with a new partner to be continuous, fast and transparent, and used tools like read receipts and Snapchat streaks to keep track. When those expectations got broken, it led to explicit conversations, and sometimes people broke them on purpose to get a reaction.5 Those expectations are rarely said out loud at three weeks in, which means each of you may be running a different rulebook.

There’s also no baseline yet. You don’t know whether their normal is three texts a day or thirty, because you’ve only known them during the honeymoon week. So when the pace settles, your brain reads the change as a message, even when it’s just a person going back to their regular life.

What might be going on for them?

Honestly, you can’t tell from the thread. The same Patel study found that more avoidant people wanted fewer messages than they received and replied slower than their partners,2 and older interview research by Pettigrew found people use texting both to keep connected and to protect their independence.6 So it’s possible that more texts from you land as a little pressure on their side. Possible, not certain.

But a slower week can also be finals, a new job, a phone that lives on Do Not Disturb, a brain that loses threads (common for some neurodivergent people), a family where texting is for logistics, or someone who’s still talking to other matches and hasn’t said so. Every one of those looks identical from your side. That’s why decoding never gets you an answer and asking sometimes does.

How does texting more backfire?

It can start a loop. You text more, they feel a little pressure, they reply less, you read the quiet as rejection and reach harder. Nobody chose it. Each move just felt reasonable at the time.

Try splitting your last anxious moment into four parts:

  • What happened: they replied “lol nice” four hours later.
  • The reading: they’re losing interest.
  • The fear: this will fade out like the last one.
  • The next step: don’t send a follow-up tonight; make one plan this week.

The facts are usually much smaller than the reading.

What can you do tonight?

  • Slow your own replies a little, not as a game, just to break the instant-reply habit. You’re allowed to finish dinner.
  • One text, then wait. If you want to say something, say it once, clearly.
  • Ask how they like to text. It’s a normal question, and the answer is real information.
  • Notice the pattern over two weeks, not two hours. Do they start conversations sometimes? Do plans actually happen?
  • If the real question is what this is, ask that one. No amount of texting answers it for you.

If worrying about replies is taking over your days, costing sleep, or getting in the way of school, work or friends, talk to a licensed mental-health professional. That’s a normal, practical step, not a dramatic one.

Try it

What does 'texting more' look like for you this week?

I reply in seconds, even mid-conversation with my friends

Speed as reassurance

Replying instantly can feel like keeping the door open, so they never have a reason to drift. It mostly teaches your nervous system that the phone is an emergency, and it sets a pace they may not match.

Your next step: Tonight, let one reply sit for twenty minutes and notice what the waiting actually feels like.

I send a second text before they've answered the first

Closing the gap

The second text is usually a question in disguise: are we still okay? The more texts in the thread, the less each one tells you, because now you can't tell whether they're answering you or catching up.

Your next step: Before a follow-up, write down what you'd want it to make them feel. Then decide if a text can do that.

I keep floating plans so I know there's a next time

Reaching for the future

Research on real message histories found anxious daters didn't always text more, but they used more future-focused language. Suggesting plans is great. Needing one locked in before you can relax is the part worth noticing.

Your next step: Make one clear plan this week, then stop pitching new ones until it happens.

I'm watching read receipts, streaks and who viewed my story

Reading the signals

Receipts, streaks and story views look like information but mostly tell you someone opened an app. Watching them keeps the question open all day without ever answering it.

Your next step: Turn off your own read receipts or mute their story for three days and see if the worry gets louder or quieter.

This is one moment. BUMIS is for the text decision keeping you up at night.See your pattern

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • If you want to ask how they like to text

    Real question, no wrong answer: are you a texting-all-day person or a save-it-for-when-we-hang-out person? I'm more the first and I'd rather know than guess.

  • If you've been double texting and want to reset

    Ok I realize I've been blowing up your phone this week, haha. No pressure to keep up. Want to just get a drink Thursday instead?

  • If the real question is where this is going

    I like this, and I've noticed I get in my head when texting goes quiet. Are you kind of seeing where this goes, or more in a casual place right now? Either answer is fine, I just want to know.

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Alexandra H. Solomon

Relational self awareness, dating and building lasting relationships, drawn from her couples work and her Northwestern course.

Licensed clinical psychologist; adjunct professor, School of Education and Social Policy, Northwestern University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Justin J. Lehmiller

Research on sex, desire, casual relationships and friends with benefits.

Social psychologist (PhD, Purdue); Senior Research Fellow, The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Nedra Glover Tawwab

Boundaries in relationships, family and friendship, and how to say what you need.

Licensed therapist; founder of Kaleidoscope Counseling · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Ramani Durvasula

Narcissistic and high conflict relationships, and recovering after leaving one.

Licensed clinical psychologist; Professor Emerita of Psychology, California State University, Los Angeles · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 8 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Attachment theory, individual psychodynamics, and relationship functioningCambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (UC Davis Adult Attachment Lab copy), 2006Used for: Shaver and Mikulincer describe attachment anxiety as linked to hyperactivating strategies (intensified efforts to get closeness and reassurance, vigilance for signs of rejection) and attachment avoidance as linked to deactivating strategies (keeping distance and playing down attachment needs).
  2. Adult Romantic Attachment, Electronic Messaging, and Relationship QualityPeer-reviewed study indexed in PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), 2022Used for: Patel, Mahar and Webster surveyed 302 romantically partnered undergraduates: more anxious people wanted more frequent messages than they received, received fewer, and replied faster than their partners replied to them; more avoidant people wanted fewer messages than they received, sent fewer, and replied slower than their partners.
  3. Women's Adult Romantic Attachment Style and Communication by Cell Phone with Romantic PartnersPsychological Reports (California State University, Monterey Bay research profiles), 2012Used for: Robert Weisskirch studied 31 female university students in romantic relationships: attachment anxiety was associated with more text messages sent to and received from partners, both estimated and actual counts; attachment avoidance was associated with fewer calls made to partners.
  4. The Impact of Attachment Style on Communication Frequency and Language Use in Romantic Partners' Text MessagesJournal of Language and Social Psychology (SAGE), via Semantic Scholar, 2025Used for: Vanderbilt, Brinberg and Lu analyzed the actual text message histories of 40 early-stage college student daters: avoidant attachment was associated with less frequent texting, anxious attachment was not associated with texting frequency, and more anxious people used more future-focused language in texts to their partner.
  5. What to expect when you are texting: An exploration of direct mobile messaging expectations among women in developing romantic relationshipsThe Journal of Social Media in Society, 2024Used for: Guest and Chang's qualitative study of women in developing romantic relationships found that direct messaging with a partner was expected to be continuous, fast and transparent; partners used features like read receipts and Snapchat streaks to manage those expectations, and violations led to explicit conversations and reminders and were sometimes used on purpose to get a reaction.
  6. Mobile Text Messaging and Connectedness within Close Interpersonal RelationshipsMarriage and Family Review (Indiana University Indianapolis ScholarWorks), 2009Used for: Pettigrew's interviews with 19 people found that texting becomes a channel where relational tensions play out: people use it both to assert autonomy and to maintain connectedness, and romantic pairs saw its benefits differently from other close pairs.
Up nextHow often should you text someone you just started dating?